← Validations
Structural Findings

Fantasy Akhada

This memorandum collects what public sources say about Fantasy Akhada, a fantasy sports brand in India, and how well each claim can be traced to a primary record. The public record is dominated by commercial data aggregators and 2023 funding coverage, with little primary company material still reachable.

fantasyakhada.com, not resolving at the reference date · Data reference date: 20 September 2026

2 of 7 structural categories this review found fully established from public sources

Headline Finding

Fantasy Akhada operates through Super Six Sports Gaming Private Limited (CIN U72900HR2019PTC083570), shown as Active on registry mirrors, with FY25 revenue of about INR 31.3 Cr (down 38%); its domain does not resolve, operating status after the 2025 gaming legislation is unconfirmed, and several data points conflict across sources.

Summary Table

Reproduced from the review's own summary table: what evidence exists for each category, whether it can be independently verified, and its resulting status.

Corporate and funding factsEstablished
Evidence available: 2023 funding report, registry mirrors
Independently verifiable: Partly, via journalism
Product and service claimsOpen
Evidence available: Funding coverage only
Independently verifiable: No
Quantitative performance claimsOpen
Evidence available: Mirror revenue, interview claims
Independently verifiable: Partly
Corporate identity and registryEstablished
Evidence available: CIN, directors, status via mirrors
Independently verifiable: Partly
AI oversight documentationUnassessed
Evidence available: None
Independently verifiable: No
Claims language positioningMonitoring item
Evidence available: Founder interview, statute summaries
Independently verifiable: Partly
Incident and safety protocolUnassessed
Evidence available: None retrieved
Independently verifiable: No

Top Evolution Opportunity

Pull MCA master data and FY 2025 filings directly to settle the revenue, headcount and profit conflicts (high impact, low cost).

Read the full structural evidence review.